The value of this attribute can be multi-or (combine using Boolean OR), multi-and (combine using Boolean AND), or none (the default, meaning multiselect is not supported for this dimension). If is-dimension is true, you can use the multiselect-type attribute to specify whether the customer can select multiple values of the dimension at the same time. In the following example, the color property is both a dimension and searchable: To make a property a Guided Search dimension, set the is-dimension attribute to true. To make a property searchable, set the text-searchable attribute to true. You can designate a property as searchable, as a dimension, or both. If a type value is not specified, it defaults to string. The value of this attribute can be date, string, boolean, integer, or float. To specify the data type of a property, you use the type attribute. The SchemaExporter component then uses the values of these attributes in the schema configuration it creates. You can use various attributes of the property element to specify the way properties of repository items should be treated in the MDEX. Appreciate your help on this.Specifying Guided Search Schema Attributes
Goutput_ok = Goutput_ok & (in.f3 = 100) Īs the above logic worked fine with the test data and facing issues when handling the real data.įor some of the records (Id's) it's working fine and for some it's not working. Seeing as DML does not have pass or noop(), then the work to set long to zero should be as fast as anything that can be done. I do not know anything faster than a long.
Select multiple components logicworks code#
I not that this code assumes that f1 can never have a valid value of -1.Īlso, I would change the temporary_type to a long. Since the records are discarded at the earliest possible point, scan() and finalize() would never be called for them. This occurs because the logic to discard records is embedded in the input_select() function. Saravanan, yes, I agree that this could have improved speed performance. Once the input_select succeeds, then scan function will get called for sure which is unnecessary. reason to reset here is because input_select gets called before initialize. Goutput_ok = 1 // reset it to 1 for a new group.
What are your thoughts on this? Do you think this would be efficient? If we go via output_select, then scan and finalize function will be called for every record.īut if we go for input_select, we could definitely avoid the calls to the scan and the finalize functions if the condition is not satisfied. Sorry, I read the req as to selecting the max and second max for the f3 = 100.īut I was also thinking to reduce the number of calls to the scan,finalize functions. So using sorted scan looks more effective. :-) Do you see any problem?Īnother approach could be using in-memory expanded rollup to check for max and second max and also f3 value as well and form a vector. G_sel_frst_two_rec = g_sel_frst_two_rec + 1 Once the input_select succeeds, then scan function will get called for sure which is unnecessary for 3rd record onwards. G_sel_frst_two_rec = 1 // reset it to 1 for a new group. So we need to restrict Scan to use only the first two records of each input group. Else the below records will also come in the output.
I think that could be the straight forward approach, but I think the input_select function is required to restrict only the first two records - max and second max.
0 kommentar(er)
